Hidden Figures and Systemic Barriers in Academic Medicine
The Bathroom Was Half a Mile Away
There is a scene in Hidden Figures where Katherine Johnson sprints across the NASA campus in heels, clutching a stack of papers, just to use the restroom. The colored bathroom is in another building. Nobody designed the system to keep Katherine from doing her job. But the system kept her from doing her job anyway.
That scene is a clean illustration of how systemic barriers actually work. Nobody at NASA said, "Let's make it harder for Katherine Johnson to calculate orbital trajectories." The barriers were structural — baked into the physical layout, the policies, the unexamined assumptions about who belonged where.
I coach physicians and faculty in academic medicine. And I see versions of that half-mile sprint every week.
Hidden Figures Leadership Lessons for Academic Medicine
The movie gives us three women — Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson — who were brilliant, relentless, and systematically disadvantaged. The film does not let anyone off the hook by pointing to a single villain. The problem was the system itself.
Academic medicine has its own version. A 2020 AAMC report found that while medical school enrollment among women and underrepresented minorities has grown substantially, representation in leadership — department chairs, deans, division chiefs — has not kept pace. The pipeline is not the problem. Something is happening between entry and advancement.
Here is what I see in my coaching work:
- Sponsorship gaps. Mentoring gets discussed constantly. Sponsorship — where a senior leader actively advocates for your promotion behind closed doors — is rarer and flows along lines of familiarity. If leadership does not look like you, finding a sponsor gets harder.
- Criteria ambiguity. When promotion standards are vague ("demonstrates national reputation"), evaluators fill in the blanks with their own assumptions. Those assumptions favor people whose careers look like theirs.
- Service tax. Faculty from underrepresented groups are disproportionately asked to serve on diversity committees and represent the department at equity events. This work is essential and almost never weighted appropriately in promotion decisions.
The Door Mary Jackson Had to Open in Court
Mary Jackson wanted to be an engineer. She had the talent. She had the math. What she did not have was access to the classes required for the credential — because those classes were held at an all-white school. She had to petition a judge for permission to attend.
Think about that. She did not lack ability. She lacked access. And the system had structured itself so that the access problem looked like a qualification problem.
This happens in academic medicine more than most leaders want to admit. A faculty member without protected research time cannot build a publication record. A faculty member not invited into collaborative grants cannot demonstrate extramural funding. A faculty member whose clinical load is disproportionately heavy cannot attend the conferences where reputations are built. The systemic barriers in academic medicine careers create gaps that get cited as evidence of insufficient performance.
It is a loop. And it does not break itself.
What Department Leaders Can Actually Do
If you lead a division or department, here is where I would start.
Audit your sponsorship patterns. Look at who got nominated for awards, leadership roles, and high-visibility projects over the past three years. Map it. If the same handful of people keep appearing, the system is replicating itself. Think of it like a basketball coach who only runs plays for one scorer — you are leaving talent on the floor.
Clarify and standardize your promotion criteria. Ambiguity is where bias lives. The more specific your expectations, the harder it is for unexamined assumptions to drive decisions. Write down what "national reputation" means. Make the rubric public.
Measure and compensate service work. If certain faculty carry a disproportionate service load, that needs to show up somewhere other than their exhaustion. Build it into workload models. Count it in promotion files. Or redistribute it.
Create structural access. Protected research time, grant-writing support, conference travel funding — these are not perks. They are prerequisites for advancement. If access is uneven, outcomes will be uneven. Design access deliberately.
The System Did Not Fix Itself
Hidden Figures gets this right: the barriers did not come down because people became less prejudiced. They came down because specific individuals forced the system to change. Kevin Costner's character takes a crowbar to the bathroom sign. It is satisfying. But it only happens after Katherine's frustration boils over.
Academic medicine will not fix its systemic barriers through awareness alone. It takes leaders willing to look at inherited structures, name what is broken, and rebuild.
The talent is already in the building. The question is whether the building is designed to let that talent reach its potential.
Learn about coaching for departments.
