Ford v Ferrari and the Art of Relentless Iteration
The Car That Kept Coming Back Broken
There is a scene in Ford v Ferrari that does not get talked about enough. Ken Miles takes the GT40 out for its first real test and brings it back in pieces. Not metaphorically. The brakes fade. The aerodynamics push it off line in the corners. The whole thing needs to be torn apart and rebuilt.
And that is exactly what they do. Then they test it again. And it breaks again. And they rebuild it again. The ford v ferrari leadership lessons that matter most are not about winning the race -- they are about the dozens of failures that made the win possible.
If you work in academic medicine and have ever launched a curriculum, redesigned a workflow, or tried to build a new program, that cycle of testing and failing should sound painfully familiar.
Relentless Iteration Is Not Perfectionism
There is an important distinction the movie draws without naming it. Miles and Shelby are not perfectionists. Perfectionists stall. They refuse to ship until everything is flawless, which means they often ship nothing at all.
What Miles does is different. He takes the imperfect car out, pushes it until it breaks, identifies where it broke, and fixes that one thing. Then he does it again. Amy Edmondson's work on psychological safety at Harvard Business School describes this as "learning from intelligent failure" -- the idea that rapid, purposeful experimentation produces better outcomes than cautious planning alone.
Relentless iteration in academic medicine looks like this:
- You pilot a new resident feedback system. It is clunky. Half the faculty forget to use it. You do not scrap it. You figure out why, adjust the process, and run it again.
- You redesign grand rounds to be more interactive. Attendance drops the first month. Instead of reverting, you talk to the people who stopped coming and learn what went wrong.
- You propose a mentoring structure for junior faculty. The first cohort gives mixed reviews. You do not conclude mentoring does not work. You conclude this version does not work yet.
The key word is "yet." Miles never looked at a broken car and said it could not be done. He said it could not be done this way.
The Garage at Night, Testing at Speed
Some of the best scenes in the film take place in Shelby's garage late at night -- Miles underneath the car with a wrench, grinding through version after version because that is what the work requires. And crucially, Miles does not test the car in a parking lot. He tests it at Le Mans speed, because that is the only environment where the real problems show up.
The physician leaders I coach who build things that last are the ones who keep showing up after the first version falls flat. They are in their own garage at night -- revising the proposal, reworking the budget, having the awkward follow-up conversation they would rather avoid. And they test under real conditions. A curriculum that works on paper may collapse when it meets actual residents with actual schedules. It is like a basketball coach who can diagram plays all day, but the only thing that matters is whether those plays hold up when the other team is pressing full court.
The goal is not to eliminate failure. The goal is to fail in conditions that teach you something useful.
What Relentless Iteration Actually Requires
Iterating is not just about willingness. It demands a few specific things:
- Short feedback loops. Miles could feel the car's problems in real time. You need mechanisms that tell you quickly what is working -- monthly check-ins, direct observation, honest conversation. Not annual surveys.
- Permission to be wrong. Every failed version of the GT40 was evidence of progress, not incompetence. If your department treats a pilot's rough edges as proof you should not have tried, iteration becomes impossible.
- Someone protecting the process. Shelby spent half the movie shielding Miles from Ford executives who wanted to pull the plug after every setback. You need a leader who understands that version three is supposed to be better than version one.
The Win Is Built From the Failures
The GT40 that won Le Mans in 1966 was not the car Ford originally built. It was the car that emerged from months of relentless iteration -- tested, broken, rebuilt, and tested again.
Your best work in academic medicine will follow the same arc. The program you are proudest of five years from now will not be the one that launched perfectly. It will be the one you refused to abandon when the first version fell short.
If you'd like to learn more, contact us to schedule a time to chat.
